So you're the New York Times, you want an Op-Ed talking about Bush's appeal to women. Do you go and find a political scientist who specializes in, say, voting patterns among women? Or do you find two Republican PR flacks, who offer a creative interpretation of Bush's acceptance speech so that it both appeals to suburban moms (what other kind of women are there, after all?) and characterizes Kerry "as an indecisive, unknown commodity who could make us all vulnerable" (Bush only mentioned Kerry once, while takling about medicare).
Dumb, dumb, dumb.
Here's something less inane.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment